Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticle

Abstract

International Society of Arboriculture
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) September 1975, 1 (9) 175; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/joa.1975.1.09.175b
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Smith, Elton. 1975 Preventing pin oak chlorosis. Woodlands Magazine Vo. 13, no. 1.

Studies have been conducted at the Ohio State University during the past several years to determine the most effective method of preventing chlorosis of pin oak. Included among the iron source treatments were spraying of the foliage, treating the soil, injecting the trees, and trunk implantations. Although all treatments resulted in increasing the iron levels in the foliage to some degree, the most effective from a visual response and increased foliage iron levels was the trunk implantation treatment of ferric ammonium citrate marketed as Medicap. Spraying the foliage resulted in only temporary effects, soil treatments were slow to react and often failed to result in desired visual response. Trunk injections of ferrous sulfate were effective for one season while the trunk implantations remained effective for three years.

  • © 1975, International Society of Arboriculture. All rights reserved.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 1, Issue 9
September 1975
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Abstract
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Abstract
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Sep 1975, 1 (9) 175; DOI: 10.48044/joa.1975.1.09.175b

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Abstract
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Sep 1975, 1 (9) 175; DOI: 10.48044/joa.1975.1.09.175b
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Correction
  • Efficacy of Bacillus Thuringiensis and Diflubenzuron on Douglas-Fir and Oak for Gypsy Moth Control in Oregon
  • Abstract
Show more Article

Similar Articles

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire